« Education for the Gifted | Half of Today's Students Are below Average in Intelligence (!) »
January 22, 2007
The Need for Respectable Vocational Education
Murray continues in his second editorial by reiterating his thesis:
"It is possible for someone with an IQ of 100 to sit in the lectures of Economics 1, read the textbook, and write answers in an examination book. But students who cannot follow complex arguments accurately are not really learning economics. They are taking away a mishmash of half-understood information and outright misunderstandings that probably leave them under the illusion that they know something they do not. (A depressing research literature documents one's inability to recognize one's own incompetence.) Traditionally and properly understood, a four-year college education teaches advanced analytic skills and information at a level that exceeds the intellectual capacity of most people.
And then he argues for socially respectable vocational training:
"No data that I have been able to find tell us what proportion of those students really want four years of college-level courses, but it is safe to say that few people who are intellectually unqualified yearn for the experience, any more than someone who is athletically unqualified for a college varsity wants to have his shortcomings exposed at practice every day. They are in college to improve their chances of making a good living. What they really need is vocational training. But nobody will say so, because 'vocational training' is second class. 'College' is first class."
"Combine those who are unqualified with those who are qualified but not interested, and some large proportion of students on today's college campuses--probably a majority of them--are looking for something that the four-year college was not designed to provide. Once there, they create a demand for practical courses, taught at an intellectual level that can be handled by someone with a mildly above-average IQ and/or mild motivation."
(Italics mine.)
I think his argument is valid, but it suffers from a static definition of what is a college education. In fact, many collegiate institutions are responding to the demand for practical courses and providing courses for students with mild motivation. This make them less collegiate only if we define college as Murray does.
Posted by DavidK at January 22, 2007 09:56 AM | Permalink